The People's Record

An ongoing chronicle of communities of resistance around the world: anti-racism, anti-zionism, anti-imperialism, the Arab Spring, anti-austerity protests in Greece and across Europe, student movements all around the world, the Occupy Movement, anti-capitalist movements, anarchist movements, socialist movements, leftist communities and other relevant international news.

photos

Find a way to get involved, make propaganda, join a group, bring the issues up in your group, PARTICIPATE in the #FearlessSummer

This summer we are escalating action against the Fossil Fuel industry! The stakes are rising & Fearless Summer is our response – a coalition of grassroots groups standing together against extreme energy. 

Fearless Summer will start with a week of action, but it’s much more than that. Fearless Summer is about mutual aid and cross-pollination. It’s about not allowing ourselves to be divided.

Like Fearless Summer on Facebook (on Tumblr here) and join us the June 24-29 week of action.

And join Rising Tide Seattle’s tar sands profiteers’ bike tour Friday June 28th.

Expect resistance. 

Thanks to Rising Tide Seattle for the second meme & Tar Sands Blockade for the information.

We need a movement focused on dismantling the fossil fuel industry and restoring balance to the earth. People are increasingly aware of and exhausted from the environmental devastation happening daily on our planet. The opportunity for a large-scale agitated movement is high. There is so much opportunity for intersectional opportunity for movement work regarding food-access for low income urban communities, indigenous sovereignty/recognition & admission that colonialism has led to this terrible environmental moment, etc.

There are more & more humans who are involved in this struggle and these are issues that affect people’s lives/livelihood. It’s a great opportunity to talk about capitalism and the profit motive. We need an environmental movement on the scale of what we’ve seen around the world – bigger, wiser & more resilient than occupy. Driven by our desire to survive & move beyond the post-industrial trash that was handed to us.

photos

Standing people movement spreads across Turkey as new tactics evolve in response to government suppression
June 19, 2013

Lunchtime in the waterfront district of Beşiktaş in Istanbul on Tuesday and Ismail Orhan has been standing silently under a yellow parasol in the blistering heat for more than four hours.

“We’ll be here for weeks, for months,” said the 25-year-old, as office workers used their lunch break to join a new wave of passive resistance to the authorities.

Instantly dubbed the “standing man” or “standing people” protest, fuelled rapidly by Twitter and other social media, the mute, peaceful, immobile gesture of resistance to a government that has used brute force to dispel three weeks of protest was launched on Monday evening in Istanbul’s Taksim Square by a performance artist, Erdem Gündüz. The “stand-in” instantly spread like a virus.

Silent protesters swelled into hundreds across different parts of Istanbul, to Ankara, Izmir and Antalya. About 10 were detained by police in Istanbul after refusing to move, but were quickly released.

In front of Orhan, by a sculpture of an eagle, were two pairs of flipflops, two pairs of trainers and a pair of tiny baby’s bootees – in remembrance of the four people killed during the unprecedented street unrest of the past three weeks and for the pregnant woman who lost her baby when riot police teargassed a luxury hotel on Saturday where terrified protesters and wounded were sheltering.

Tahsin, 63, a bank employee who did not want to use his full name, spent his lunch break joining the handful of protesters, who included elderly women.

“I’m supporting everything that’s been going on peacefully for the last two weeks. I wouldn’t think we could be arrested. That would be really far fetched,” he said.

Hundreds more joined them at different locations. Some brought books to settle in for a long haul. Bottles of water were the most common accompaniment in a poignant and dignified display of rebellion against a government increasingly seen as high-handed and out of touch.

“I’m just stopping, standing, not speaking. Just drinking water,” said Merve Uslu, 21, a student. “I heard about the standing man and it touched my heart so much. I don’t support clashes with police but we’re just resisting basically.”

Elsewhere in the city early on Tuesday, however, the Turkish police swooped on dozens of hard-left activists, arresting more than 90 people in the first big clampdown since the prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, ordered police to fire tear gas and use water cannons in their attack on Saturday evening to clear Gezi Park of thousands of demonstrators, inciting a night of violence across much of central Istanbul.

Erdoğan’s confrontational response to the challenge to his 10-year rule has shocked much of Turkey and brought growing criticism internationally.

On Tuesday, the UN’s human rights commissioner, Navi Pillay, called for officials and security forces using excessive force to be punished.

“It is important that the authorities recognise that the initial, extremely heavy-handed response to the protests, which resulted in many injuries, is still a major part of the problem,” she said.

But the message from Erdoğan was the very opposite as he divided Turkey into friends and foes, and characterised the largely peaceful protests of recent weeks as orchestrated violence.

“Thanks to this process, we know our enemies and allies as they came out and showed their true colours,” said the prime minister.

“The police have been represented as using violence. Who used violence? All of the terrorists, the anarchists, the rioters … In the face of a comprehensive and systematic movement of violence, the police displayed an unprecedented democratic stance and successfully passed the test of democracy.”

In addition to Tuesday’s arrests, at least 90 protesters were detained during the weekend violence. According to Turkish media reports on Tuesday, most have been released but 13 are to be brought before the courts, which human rights monitors say have been increasingly politicised under Erdoğan.

A lawyer who wished to remain anonymous said the number of arbitrary arrests was very worrying. “Many of those arrested over the course of these protests have been denied access to lawyers for hours; they were made to wait for a long time, some are still waiting,” she said. “A red line has definitely been crossed with this.”

The prime minister also came under strong attack from other parts of the political spectrum. Selahattin Demirtaş, a co-leader of the main Kurdish political party, the BDP, harshly criticised the government’s stance.

Directing his remarks at Erdoğan, he said: “At the moment you look like a leader who tries to stay in power with the help of tanks and batons … This is a movement of the people and you are trying to pit the people against the people.”

With the police still out in force on Taksim Square and municipal workers rolling out new lawns, planting rose gardens and new magnolia trees in Gezi Park, the cradle of the rebellion, there were calls for the protest to shift to other park areas across the country on Tuesday evening.

Police weariness appears to be growing, as well as sympathy for the mainly young people they have been confronting for weeks. “This is a good way of demonstrating, a very good way,” one riot police officer said of the stand-in. “There is absolutely nothing wrong with peaceful protests; that should be everybody’s right.”

He laughed when asked if he would consider joining: “I have been standing here for two weeks already anyway.”

Determined to carry on with his act of civil disobedience, Orhan said he and his fellow protesters just wanted “peace and democracy”. If protesting entailed the prospect of arrest, so be it.

“Under normal circumstances it should not be a crime to just stand here peacefully. But in Erdoğan’s Turkey, everything is possible.”

Source

photos

thesmithian:

…up to 200,000 people angry with high costs and poor public services took to the streets. Protesters in Rio de Janeiro burned cars and looted buildings as police attempted to disperse them with teargas and rubber bullets. Aerial images showed thousands of people attempting to storm the congress building in Brasilia. The rallies…are some of the biggest ever seen in the country…

more.

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

video

designtherevolution:

fathommythoughts:

hazzlur:

laughterbynight:

thegeekmonkey:

actualhumandisaster:

awayy:

tank-commander:

underthevastblueseas:

Blackfish - Trailer

Beyond the lies, beneath the deception, the truth will surface.

Magnolia Pictures has debuted the trailer for the chilling Sundance documentary Blackfish, directed Gabriela Cowperthwaite, about orcas in captivity. 

Holy shit. 

OKAY, WE NEED TO REBLOG THE FUCK OUT OF THIS. EVEN IF YOU’RE NOT AN ANIMAL PERSON, YOUR FOLLOWERS NEED TO SEE THIS. ESPECIALLY DURING THE HEIGHT OF VACATION SEASON. DO NOT SUPPORT SEA PARKS WITH CAPTIVE WHALES. IT’S NOT ENVIRONMENTAL PROPAGANDA (I can’t believe I even used those words) IT’S A REAL ISSUE AND IT’S NOT A MATTER OF PROOF, IT’S A MATTER OF COVERING IT UP AND IGNORING IT!

Throughout my entire childhood, I wanted to be a Shamu trainer, and I remember when this happened I realized how horrible it was for these whales to be kept in such small confinements… so I am beyond happy they’ve made a movie covering this stuff…

REBLOG GUYS, SPREAD THE WORD. MAKE IT GO VIRAL. 

designtherevolution:

My wife wrote an article about captive wild animals last year. 

Wild animals kept in captivity, whether born there or captured in the wild, are inherently dangerous. The recently surfaced video of a trainer being held under water by an orca at SeaWorld highlights this reality. No matter how much human contact they receive, these animals remain, at core, unpredictable…

Read more here and watch the video: http://aldf.org/blog/on-protecting-captive-wild-animals-and-nonhuman-animals/

video

idlenomorewisconsin:

Published on Apr 19, 2013

Here is my Documentary on the Idle no more movement that has taken place in canada. It concerns the federal governments decisions for the water in canada. Which effects the treaty rights of the first nations people.

Great job, great short doc.

I can’t even believe what some of the terrible white men are saying on the news at the beginning of this video. 

photo

n8gallagher:

thepeoplesrecord:

The People’s Record coming to Portland the 20th, leaving the 23rd!
Need recommendations for groups, activists, community leaders etc who would make good interviews that we can reach out to ASAP.
Also need housing offer. We may or may not having something worked out…waiting to hear back. If not, then we have a pretty narrow period of time to find housing for the nights of the 20th, 21st and 22nd. If you can house us for any/all nights, please don’t hesitate to reach out. There are two of us, friendly, easy-going, not-too-weird! Pets are fine, 420 friendly, etc. Really, we’re not fussy at all. The closer to transit the better.
Also looking for recommendations for Seattle interviews!
Email: thepeoplesrec@gmail.com
UPDATE:
Thanks for the recommendations so far. Looks like we have housing for the 21st. We need housing for the day we come in, the 20th. Please reblog if you don’t mind, especially if you live around the Portland area or have a lot of friends who do. Feel free to ask around on our behalf.

Help my friends find a place to stay please reblog to Portlanders.

Thanks nate (designtherevolution)! We’re leaving on a greyhound for Portland in a few hours. It’s a 16 hour ride so we still have 24 hours to find housing, but we still don’t have anything worked out for the first night of the 20th. If anyone is willing to put us up for a night, it would be a big help, if you know of any cheap housing alternatives, let us know. That would be great too. 

n8gallagher:

thepeoplesrecord:

The People’s Record coming to Portland the 20th, leaving the 23rd!

Need recommendations for groups, activists, community leaders etc who would make good interviews that we can reach out to ASAP.

Also need housing offer. We may or may not having something worked out…waiting to hear back. If not, then we have a pretty narrow period of time to find housing for the nights of the 20th, 21st and 22nd. If you can house us for any/all nights, please don’t hesitate to reach out. There are two of us, friendly, easy-going, not-too-weird! Pets are fine, 420 friendly, etc. Really, we’re not fussy at all. The closer to transit the better.

Also looking for recommendations for Seattle interviews!

Email: thepeoplesrec@gmail.com

UPDATE:

Thanks for the recommendations so far. Looks like we have housing for the 21st. We need housing for the day we come in, the 20th. Please reblog if you don’t mind, especially if you live around the Portland area or have a lot of friends who do. Feel free to ask around on our behalf.

Help my friends find a place to stay please reblog to Portlanders.

Thanks nate (designtherevolution)! We’re leaving on a greyhound for Portland in a few hours. It’s a 16 hour ride so we still have 24 hours to find housing, but we still don’t have anything worked out for the first night of the 20th. If anyone is willing to put us up for a night, it would be a big help, if you know of any cheap housing alternatives, let us know. That would be great too. 

(via corderohinojosa)

photo

ACLU sues NYPD over unconstitutional Muslim surveillance programJune 18, 2013
The ACLU, together with the NYCLU and CUNY’s CLEAR Project, filed a lawsuit today challenging the New York Police Department’s unconstitutional policy and practice of targeting entire Muslim communities for discriminatory and suspicionless surveillance. The NYPD’s vast religious profiling program has cast an unjustified badge of suspicion and stigma on hundreds of thousands of innocent New Yorkers, based on nothing more than their religious faith and practice. We represent civic and religious leaders, two mosques, and a charitable organization, all of whom were swept up in the police department’s dragnet surveillance because they are Muslim.
As documented extensively in the NYPD’s own records and in Pulitzer prize-winning reporting by the Associated Press, NYPD officers and informants have routinely monitored mosques and businesses frequented by Muslims, including restaurants and bookstores. The department has also sent paid infiltrators into mosques, Muslim student associations, and beyond to take photos, write down license plate numbers, and keep notes on people simply because they are Muslim. Video surveillance cameras have been mounted outside mosques, recording every person who goes to worship. Maps created and maintained by the NYPD show the location of scores of mosques and Muslim businesses across New York’s five boroughs. A senior NYPD representative has admitted that these mapping activities have not generated a single lead or resulted in even one terrorism investigation.
The NYPD’s discriminatory surveillance is based on a false and unconstitutional premise: that Muslim religious belief and practices are a basis for law enforcement scrutiny. That is a premise rooted in bias and ignorance, not good law enforcement or fact. It is a premise that is both demonstrably wrong—terrorism is not a Muslim phenomenon—and deeply unfair to the millions of American Muslims who are a law-abiding, diverse, and integral part of our nation and New York City. The NYPD’s surveillance program would be unthinkable if it targeted churches or synagogues, Christian reading rooms or Jewish community centers. The fact that it maps and sends informants into mosques and Muslim-owned businesses is no different. Like all Americans, our Muslim communities are entitled to protection from discriminatory religious profiling and intrusive police surveillance.
The NYPD’s religious profiling has profoundly harmed New York’s Muslim community. Long before the AP confirmed the vast scope of this program, knowledge and fear of unjustified surveillance permeated the community. Our client’s stories how deep the damage has been. The NYPD’s monitoring of mosques has forced religious leaders to censor what they say to their congregants, for fear that their statements could be taken out of context by police officers or informants, resulting in further unjustified scrutiny, or worse. Some religious leaders have felt the need to regularly record their sermons to defend themselves against potential mischaracterizations. Disruptions resulting from NYPD surveillance have also diverted precious time and resources away from religious education and counseling, both of which are part of mosques’ core religious mission. And fear of NYPD surveillance has diminished congregants’ attendance at mosques, prompted distrust of newcomers out of concern that they are NYPD informants, and prevented the mosques from fulfilling their mission of serving as religious sanctuaries.
The same fear of NYPD surveillance has also diminished the ability of charities—like one of our clients, Muslims Giving Back—to raise funds to support their efforts. Muslims Giving Back and one of its leaders, our client Asad Dandia, discovered in October 2012 that the group had been infiltrated for months by a paid NYPD informant posing as a friend and enthusiastic participant in the organization’s religious mission. Since then, mosques have been reluctant to host or support Muslims Giving Back, for fear of other NYPD informants. This type of chronic mistrust cripples the ability of organizations like Muslims Giving Back to solicit the donations from congregants that sustain their charitable activities. Baseless law enforcement scrutiny has interfered with Muslims Giving Back and Asad’s mission of promoting and providing charity to needy New Yorkers in accordance with one of Islam’s primary tenets.
Read more about our clients here.
This discriminatory profiling and the harms it has caused our clients violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and the First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion and guarantee of government neutrality toward religion. Our suit asks the court to end the NYPD’s Muslim surveillance program and to prevent future surveillance based solely or predominantly on religion in the absence of individualized suspicion of criminal activity. It also seeks to expunge the records of all of our clients created because of the program, and to appoint a monitor to ensure that New York City truly ends all of the unconstitutional practices inherent in its religious surveillance efforts. We hope the court recognizes that suspicionless and discriminatory surveillance based on nothing more than religious identity has no place in New York, or anywhere else.
Source
Submitted by http://dashielsheen.tumblr.com/

ACLU sues NYPD over unconstitutional Muslim surveillance program
June 18, 2013

The ACLU, together with the NYCLU and CUNY’s CLEAR Project, filed a lawsuit today challenging the New York Police Department’s unconstitutional policy and practice of targeting entire Muslim communities for discriminatory and suspicionless surveillance. The NYPD’s vast religious profiling program has cast an unjustified badge of suspicion and stigma on hundreds of thousands of innocent New Yorkers, based on nothing more than their religious faith and practice. We represent civic and religious leaders, two mosques, and a charitable organization, all of whom were swept up in the police department’s dragnet surveillance because they are Muslim.

As documented extensively in the NYPD’s own records and in Pulitzer prize-winning reporting by the Associated Press, NYPD officers and informants have routinely monitored mosques and businesses frequented by Muslims, including restaurants and bookstores. The department has also sent paid infiltrators into mosques, Muslim student associations, and beyond to take photos, write down license plate numbers, and keep notes on people simply because they are Muslim. Video surveillance cameras have been mounted outside mosques, recording every person who goes to worship. Maps created and maintained by the NYPD show the location of scores of mosques and Muslim businesses across New York’s five boroughs. A senior NYPD representative has admitted that these mapping activities have not generated a single lead or resulted in even one terrorism investigation.

The NYPD’s discriminatory surveillance is based on a false and unconstitutional premise: that Muslim religious belief and practices are a basis for law enforcement scrutiny. That is a premise rooted in bias and ignorance, not good law enforcement or fact. It is a premise that is both demonstrably wrong—terrorism is not a Muslim phenomenon—and deeply unfair to the millions of American Muslims who are a law-abiding, diverse, and integral part of our nation and New York City. The NYPD’s surveillance program would be unthinkable if it targeted churches or synagogues, Christian reading rooms or Jewish community centers. The fact that it maps and sends informants into mosques and Muslim-owned businesses is no different. Like all Americans, our Muslim communities are entitled to protection from discriminatory religious profiling and intrusive police surveillance.

The NYPD’s religious profiling has profoundly harmed New York’s Muslim community. Long before the AP confirmed the vast scope of this program, knowledge and fear of unjustified surveillance permeated the community. Our client’s stories how deep the damage has been. The NYPD’s monitoring of mosques has forced religious leaders to censor what they say to their congregants, for fear that their statements could be taken out of context by police officers or informants, resulting in further unjustified scrutiny, or worse. Some religious leaders have felt the need to regularly record their sermons to defend themselves against potential mischaracterizations. Disruptions resulting from NYPD surveillance have also diverted precious time and resources away from religious education and counseling, both of which are part of mosques’ core religious mission. And fear of NYPD surveillance has diminished congregants’ attendance at mosques, prompted distrust of newcomers out of concern that they are NYPD informants, and prevented the mosques from fulfilling their mission of serving as religious sanctuaries.

The same fear of NYPD surveillance has also diminished the ability of charities—like one of our clients, Muslims Giving Back—to raise funds to support their efforts. Muslims Giving Back and one of its leaders, our client Asad Dandia, discovered in October 2012 that the group had been infiltrated for months by a paid NYPD informant posing as a friend and enthusiastic participant in the organization’s religious mission. Since then, mosques have been reluctant to host or support Muslims Giving Back, for fear of other NYPD informants. This type of chronic mistrust cripples the ability of organizations like Muslims Giving Back to solicit the donations from congregants that sustain their charitable activities. Baseless law enforcement scrutiny has interfered with Muslims Giving Back and Asad’s mission of promoting and providing charity to needy New Yorkers in accordance with one of Islam’s primary tenets.

Read more about our clients here.

This discriminatory profiling and the harms it has caused our clients violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and the First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion and guarantee of government neutrality toward religion. Our suit asks the court to end the NYPD’s Muslim surveillance program and to prevent future surveillance based solely or predominantly on religion in the absence of individualized suspicion of criminal activity. It also seeks to expunge the records of all of our clients created because of the program, and to appoint a monitor to ensure that New York City truly ends all of the unconstitutional practices inherent in its religious surveillance efforts. We hope the court recognizes that suspicionless and discriminatory surveillance based on nothing more than religious identity has no place in New York, or anywhere else.

Source

Submitted by http://dashielsheen.tumblr.com/

text

Undocumented Students

Dear Community,

Join Liz and Vivi for a pozole dinner fundraiser for college expenses on Saturday, July 13, 2013 from 5:00pm - 8:00pm. The fundraiser will take place at 2700 E. Valley Parkway, Escondido Ca, 92027. Dinner will include a bowl of pozole, a water (agua fresca), and a slice of cake.

Tickets will be pre-sold for a suggested $10 donation or can be bought at the door the day of the event. Contact Liz (760) 670-9934, or Vivi (760) 917-1334 to purchase tickets or respond to this email.

All proceeds from ticket sales will go to support the college expenses of Liz, a CSUSM Sociology student and Vivi, a SDSU Graphic Design student for the Fall 2013 semester. As continuing college undocumented students your support will truly make a difference in our education.

Attached is the flyer for our fundraiser. Feel free to invite other community members or forward this email to friends that may be interested in attending the fundraiser. If you can not attend the fundraiser but would like to donate you can do so online through our FundRazr account (https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/3Wgz4).

We can’t wait to see you there!

Sincerely,

Liz and Vivi

Submitted by: http://vivi-ahna.tumblr.com/

text

redplebeian:

thepeoplesrecord:

redplebeian:

pragnacious:

openlayla64:

anarcamus:

mutualistrebelnews:

On the real though, it’s WAY easier to condemn than create.

Let me ask a question—and with it, include a disclaimer that I don’t think party-building or newspaper sales actually constitute good praxis at all:

What SHOULD they be doing?

Like, what’s the game plan here? What’s the plan of attack? Does anyone have any idea?

Yeah newspaper sales are a joke, and a funny one at that. No, they don’t work. But what should these guys do instead?

What should ANY of us be doing?

I’m more critiquing the Socialists than anything else. They’re acting as if the revolution is tomorrow IF ONLY WE SOLD MORE PAPERS.

Like, I’m just fucking mad that they think newpapers are the only way to communicate. that they think the state is the only way to organize. That they do things simply out of tradition and not out of effectiveness.

Fuck the newspapers. Go fucking talk to union leaders. Talk to coworkers. ANYTHING BESIDES BECOMING A SUBCULTURE. The groups here are literally hang out groups. Everyone in the WIL are friends and hang out and drink and whatever. They’ll go out, set up a table, bother some people walking to class, sell a paper or two, then go back to one of their houses and hang out.

It’s a subculture, not a threat. It’s empty slogans. I just want them to acknowledge that what they’re doing isn’t working, and they need to think before they sell. Think before they act. Like, how many times do you need to hold paper sales, sell nothing, and go home, to realize that it isn’t working? They do the same thing every fucking week. It’s a routine.

I don’t know what we should be doing, I just know that we can’t keep repeating the same mistakes and same actions if they’re not helping at all.

Just because the ISO and the CPUSA are more focused on selling papers than anything doesn’t mean anything. Trots and democratic socialists don’t speak for anyone but themselves; I’m a socialist and I’m assisting in starting up a chapter of the IWW here in Dallas, I talk to coworkers, I openly criticize (and mind you, I work at a place notorious for union-busting), and I happily work with anarchists. Please don’t generalize and group all socialists together just because a couple of college frat ISO Trots think that selling newspapers are a legitimate form of starting a revolution.

Um, the vice president of the Chicago teachers union is an ISO member, as is a large proportion of CORE. This is not to mention the large number of members who are rank and file union members. One of my closest comrades is a union steward. 

ISO branches are almost ubiquitously involved with Students for Justice in Palestine chapters. This is the work my branch focuses on. Comrades at my branch have been involved in Occupy, have organized for Prison Awareness Week, and have attended actions sponsored by the farm laborers’ union FLOC. That’s not even a complete list of the stuff we’ve done beyond “selling papers” and we’re a small and frankly ineffectual branch when compared to others. 

I’ve interned with FLOC and have been heavily involved in prison activism for about three years now. This isn’t strictly ISO work, but I’m an ISO member who’s sure doing shit other than selling papers and the work I do is highly informed by what I have learned in the ISO. 

The ISO branch in Detroit has organized and/or co-sponsored several panels in opposition to racism and police brutality. Among other events, we had a panel that included as speakers Mertilla Jones, Aiyana Johnes’ grandmother, as well as community leaders and comrades. Via local ISO events, I’ve heard former members of DRUM and the Black Panthers speak. Just in the last year, the Detroit branch has also done day schools on Rape Culture and Leninist Organizing. 

Which is not even to mention the fact that the ISO puts on the biggest and best Left conference in the country every single year. 

This whole “ISO thinks selling new papers will start the revolution” thing is complete and utter bullshit, and frankly that level of bullshit can only come from ignorance or willful dishonesty. 

That line; “This whole “ISO thinks selling new papers will start the revolution” thing is complete and utter bullshit, and frankly that level of bullshit can only come from ignorance or willful dishonesty.” needs to repeated everywhere. I’m so fucking sick of that silly baseless piece of nonsense. Seriously, if someone actually thinks that, that all we do is sell papers, then you clearly have never actually met any of us or worked with any of us. The extent of our work is pretty goddam broad, significant and diverse, there is no way to sum it up. And even then, it always bugged me how some Anarchists put so much on putting zines and the like, but if you do the exact same thing but call it a paper, then there’s something wrong with you (also the IWW has a paper too, you know).

There’s definitely some mis-characterization here but there’s also alot of truth to the criticism. I just think selling papers on the corner is destructive organizationally, and I think there is a cultural problem within some organizations that doesn’t allow the sort of criticism that would change that to really be dealt with in the organization. 

Like, I’ve seen it brought up many times in different groups, and the response is always pretty dogmatically in ‘defense of a revolutionary paper!’ I think selling papers on the corner is a big turn off for people who might be sympathetic to your political views otherwise, especially if you have a kind of really weird/outdated looking website. I think it’s one of those ‘elevation of tactics to the ideological level’ things that I hear lots of socialists level as a criticism against anarchists. 

I don’t have a dog in this race. I’d love to see some cooperative broad synthesis between what I see in alot of Trotskyists and what I see among anarcho-syndicalists. I think Richard Wolff and others have started to do lay the ground work for framing this sort of strategic union. I think there has to be some broader identity for leftists who are devoted to making communism happen and can see multiple paths, who are not married to any one strategy and don’t believe there is some pre-written answer based on completely different circumstances 100+ years ago. And that doesn’t mean just throwing in the line ‘There is no pre-written answer,’ in your talk right before you start announcing the definitive historic lessons of far-gone revolutions. I think newspaper sales are self-destructive for the organizations that utilize that as an ‘important/valued’ strategy. Have a paper, maybe spend some money giving it away. It shouldn’t be a highly valued tactic. 

Most of the issues I see both in groups of socialists and anarchists are issues regarding the culture of the groups, not necessarily the ideology they reflect. I seen no practical reason why newspaper sales should be held onto so rigidly. Neither would I recommend bands of anarchists selling zines on various corners, coming to rallies that others have spent alot of energy organizing and trying to focus on selling zines. It fosters discontent for your organization. It is not constructive. I also would like to see more emphasis on stuff that isn’t Russian/Bolshevik specific. I don’t mean ignore the history, but allow a culture to develop in your organization that reflects society today, use terminology that is relevant. If there isn’t a practical use for emulating Bolshevik words all the time, stop. It can be distancing for people who are new to your politics. Allow the culture of the organization to breath a little.

These are real criticisms. There are real problems in these organizations. And I love you all so much. I want to see you grow, flourish, succeed and become wildly popular. I want a broad, strong, mighty left. I want a communist future. But I think there’s a lack of seriousness/maturity dominating the culture of certain groups, and I think there is a knee-jerk reaction to suppress, dismiss and ignore criticism rather than really consider & engage with it. 

-Robert

I think there is an ass-backwardness to a lot of the criticism that is both dated and missing what is really being argued about here. The paper is just a tool. Its not the reason for setting up tables on street corners by any stretch of the imagination. The purpose is to set up tables on street corners and wherever else to engage with people in discussion. To talk politics in the public area and in the community. Thats it. Thats what you are all on about. The paper can be a usefull tool in doing that at times, conversation starters and such, but sometimes a petition works better, or just handing out fliers, or something else. We’re not married to the paper. We don’t even call them “paper sales,” they’re called “Tablings” cause that’s the purpose. And I can’t imagine anyone who’d have an issue with that, of trying to engage with the public, of getting socialist ideas out there, of trying to break through the corporate media sound barrier with radical politics, by just talking and relating to people. Thats all it is.

Yeah, I understand that that’s the intent. But you must be aware of how it is perceived. In a society where print-media is increasingly not a preferred means of information, to have people walking around asking for a $1 for a paper, breeds suspicion and distance. When you use it to start conversations, and then say, would you like a copy, it’ll cost $1, that’s really weird, it can make people really uncomfortable, and (I believe) does a disservice to you strategically.It feels like the same format as a sales pitch.

If it is a tool, then do what you would do with an ineffective tool, throw it away, pick up another tool, try something else. That’s what I’m saying - try something else. Put energy into paperless tablings. Try and come up with creative alternatives. Try LOTS of stuff. I’ve been to ISO & other tablings in several cities. I’m sorry but I see the same kinda-weird stuff over and over, and the same reactions by people who feel like they are being asked if ‘they’ve heard the good news’ or if ‘they can spare a bit of change’ because the interactions are very often more like that than a lively political discussion.

It’s intention & ideal execution are not the problem. It’s the reality of what actually happens, and how it is perceived by people who could be very turned off. I mean, ask yourself, how would you know when paper sales became ineffective? Do you believe there will come a time when print media digestion has dropped to a point that paper sales won’t be the best tool for having a political conversation? How will you know when you get there?

photo

U.S. Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of FirmsJune 15, 2013
Thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies are working closely with U.S. national security agencies, providing sensitive information and in return receiving benefits that include access to classified intelligence, four people familiar with the process said.
These programs, whose participants are known as trusted partners, extend far beyond what was revealed by Edward Snowden, a computer technician who did work for the National Security Agency. The role of private companies has come under intense scrutiny since his disclosure this month that the NSA is collecting millions of U.S. residents’ telephone records and the computer communications of foreigners from Google Inc (GOOG) and other Internet companies under court order.
Many of these same Internet and telecommunications companies voluntarily provide U.S. intelligence organizations with additional data, such as equipment specifications, that don’t involve private communications of their customers, the four people said.
Makers of hardware and software, banks, Internet security providers, satellite telecommunications companies and many other companies also participate in the government programs. In some cases, the information gathered may be used not just to defend the nation but to help infiltrate computers of its adversaries.
Along with the NSA, the Central Intelligence Agency (0112917D), the Federal Bureau of Investigation and branches of the U.S. military have agreements with such companies to gather data that might seem innocuous but could be highly useful in the hands of U.S. intelligence or cyber warfare units, according to the people, who have either worked for the government or are in companies that have these accords.
Read more

“Thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies are working closely with U.S. national security agencies, providing sensitive information and in return receiving benefits that include access to classified intelligence.”
This begs the question why corporations should get clearance to access to “classified” intelligence… 

Submitted by http://dashielsheen.tumblr.com/

U.S. Agencies Said to Swap Data With Thousands of Firms
June 15, 2013

Thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies are working closely with U.S. national security agencies, providing sensitive information and in return receiving benefits that include access to classified intelligence, four people familiar with the process said.

These programs, whose participants are known as trusted partners, extend far beyond what was revealed by Edward Snowden, a computer technician who did work for the National Security Agency. The role of private companies has come under intense scrutiny since his disclosure this month that the NSA is collecting millions of U.S. residents’ telephone records and the computer communications of foreigners from Google Inc (GOOG) and other Internet companies under court order.

Many of these same Internet and telecommunications companies voluntarily provide U.S. intelligence organizations with additional data, such as equipment specifications, that don’t involve private communications of their customers, the four people said.

Makers of hardware and software, banks, Internet security providers, satellite telecommunications companies and many other companies also participate in the government programs. In some cases, the information gathered may be used not just to defend the nation but to help infiltrate computers of its adversaries.

Along with the NSA, the Central Intelligence Agency (0112917D), the Federal Bureau of Investigation and branches of the U.S. military have agreements with such companies to gather data that might seem innocuous but could be highly useful in the hands of U.S. intelligence or cyber warfare units, according to the people, who have either worked for the government or are in companies that have these accords.

Read more

“Thousands of technology, finance and manufacturing companies are working closely with U.S. national security agencies, providing sensitive information and in return receiving benefits that include access to classified intelligence.”

This begs the question why corporations should get clearance to access to “classified” intelligence… 

Submitted by http://dashielsheen.tumblr.com/

photo

The People’s Record coming to Portland the 20th, leaving the 23rd!
Need recommendations for groups, activists, community leaders etc who would make good interviews that we can reach out to ASAP.
Also need housing offer. We may or may not having something worked out…waiting to hear back. If not, then we have a pretty narrow period of time to find housing for the nights of the 20th, 21st and 22nd. If you can house us for any/all nights, please don’t hesitate to reach out. There are two of us, friendly, easy-going, not-too-weird! Pets are fine, 420 friendly, etc. Really, we’re not fussy at all. The closer to transit the better.
Also looking for recommendations for Seattle interviews!
Email: thepeoplesrec@gmail.com

UPDATE:
Thanks for the recommendations so far. Looks like we have housing for the 21st. We need housing for the day we come in, the 20th. Please reblog if you don’t mind, especially if you live around the Portland area or have a lot of friends who do. Feel free to ask around on our behalf.

The People’s Record coming to Portland the 20th, leaving the 23rd!

Need recommendations for groups, activists, community leaders etc who would make good interviews that we can reach out to ASAP.

Also need housing offer. We may or may not having something worked out…waiting to hear back. If not, then we have a pretty narrow period of time to find housing for the nights of the 20th, 21st and 22nd. If you can house us for any/all nights, please don’t hesitate to reach out. There are two of us, friendly, easy-going, not-too-weird! Pets are fine, 420 friendly, etc. Really, we’re not fussy at all. The closer to transit the better.

Also looking for recommendations for Seattle interviews!

Email: thepeoplesrec@gmail.com

UPDATE:

Thanks for the recommendations so far. Looks like we have housing for the 21st. We need housing for the day we come in, the 20th. Please reblog if you don’t mind, especially if you live around the Portland area or have a lot of friends who do. Feel free to ask around on our behalf.

(Source: thepeoplesrecord, via r3l4t10n5h1p5-r-4-chump5)

photo

Breaking: Hung jury in case of Detroit police officer accused in 7-year-old Aiyana Jones shooting - The jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the case of Detroit Police officer Joseph Weekley who was accused in the death of 7-year-old Aiyana Jones.
Earlier Tuesday, the jury told the court they were having trouble reaching a verdict in the case and the judge ordered them to continue deliberations.
Hours later the court announced that there was a hung jury.

Weekley was charged with Involuntary Manslaughter in the death of 7-year-old Aiyana Jones during a raid on her family’s home on May 16, 2010. Aiyana was shot during the raid, which was caught on tape by crews filming for the reality show “The First 48.”

Aiyana’s family has endured continued harassment from the Detroit PD, including when police in riot gear invaded the family’s new home after her death. 

Family members said they were struck, shoved and called racist and sexist names as police officers, some in plainclothes, forced their way into the home on Detroit’s far east side.
Five children were there at the time, including a one-month old baby, a two-year-old toddler, and a five-year old.
“I was just sitting here watching my grandson,” Mertilla Jones, Aiyana’s paternal grandmother said. “Four cop cars pulled up and then they were coming from all over. They tried to grab Bobbie (Aiyana’s cousin), but he came in the house and me and Lakiya and R. J. [Rafael Jones] went out on the porch. The Black cop hit me in the mouth with a flashlight, and pushed and shoved me.”

Breaking: Hung jury in case of Detroit police officer accused in 7-year-old Aiyana Jones shooting The jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the case of Detroit Police officer Joseph Weekley who was accused in the death of 7-year-old Aiyana Jones.

Earlier Tuesday, the jury told the court they were having trouble reaching a verdict in the case and the judge ordered them to continue deliberations.

Hours later the court announced that there was a hung jury.

Weekley was charged with Involuntary Manslaughter in the death of 7-year-old Aiyana Jones during a raid on her family’s home on May 16, 2010. Aiyana was shot during the raid, which was caught on tape by crews filming for the reality show “The First 48.”

Aiyana’s family has endured continued harassment from the Detroit PD, including when police in riot gear invaded the family’s new home after her death. 

Family members said they were struck, shoved and called racist and sexist names as police officers, some in plainclothes, forced their way into the home on Detroit’s far east side.

Five children were there at the time, including a one-month old baby, a two-year-old toddler, and a five-year old.

“I was just sitting here watching my grandson,” Mertilla Jones, Aiyana’s paternal grandmother said. “Four cop cars pulled up and then they were coming from all over. They tried to grab Bobbie (Aiyana’s cousin), but he came in the house and me and Lakiya and R. J. [Rafael Jones] went out on the porch. The Black cop hit me in the mouth with a flashlight, and pushed and shoved me.”

Following