UN: US drone strikes ‘could be war crimes’ & set risky precedent (photo)June 22, 2012
The use of drone strikes by the US to combat terrorism flouts international law and may encourage other nations to follow suit, a UN rapporteur says. He stressed that some of the attacks may constitute war crimes.
Christof Heyns, the UN special investigator on extrajudicial killings told a UN conference in Geneva that the US needs to be held legally accountable for the use of armed drones.
"Are we to accept major changes to the international legal system which has been in existence since World War Two and survived nuclear threats?" he said.
He also requested that the Obama administration publish statistics on the number of civilian deaths caused by strikes on suspected terror leaders in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen.
“I don’t think we have the full answer to the legal framework, we certainly don’t have the answer to the accountability issues,” he told reporters at the UN Human Rights Council meeting.
He underlined the fact that recent US drone strikes threatened the rule of international law in that many “targeted killings take place far from areas where it’s recognized as being an armed conflict.” Heyns added that drone strikes may be legally justifiable in conflict zones such as Afghanistan.
He went on to say however that if “there have been secondary drone strikes on rescuers who are helping [the injured] after an initial drone attack, those further attacks are a war crime.”
Lampooning the US stance that targeted strikes are a legitimate response to the 9/11 attacks orchestrated by Al Qaeda he said “it’s difficult to see how any killings carried out in 2012 can be justified in response to [events] in 2001. Some states seem to want to invent new laws to justify new practices.”
The US argues that its drone strikes are highly effective at combating insurgency abroad and do not violate international law. However, Washington has come under fire recently for multiple drone incursions that killed dozens of civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Both China and Russia issued statements to the UN Human Rights Council this week condemning the US use of drone strikes.
Source

UN: US drone strikes ‘could be war crimes’ & set risky precedent (photo)
June 22, 2012

The use of drone strikes by the US to combat terrorism flouts international law and may encourage other nations to follow suit, a UN rapporteur says. He stressed that some of the attacks may constitute war crimes.

Christof Heyns, the UN special investigator on extrajudicial killings told a UN conference in Geneva that the US needs to be held legally accountable for the use of armed drones.

"Are we to accept major changes to the international legal system which has been in existence since World War Two and survived nuclear threats?" he said.

He also requested that the Obama administration publish statistics on the number of civilian deaths caused by strikes on suspected terror leaders in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen.

“I don’t think we have the full answer to the legal framework, we certainly don’t have the answer to the accountability issues,” he told reporters at the UN Human Rights Council meeting.

He underlined the fact that recent US drone strikes threatened the rule of international law in that many “targeted killings take place far from areas where it’s recognized as being an armed conflict.” Heyns added that drone strikes may be legally justifiable in conflict zones such as Afghanistan.

He went on to say however that if “there have been secondary drone strikes on rescuers who are helping [the injured] after an initial drone attack, those further attacks are a war crime.”

Lampooning the US stance that targeted strikes are a legitimate response to the 9/11 attacks orchestrated by Al Qaeda he said “it’s difficult to see how any killings carried out in 2012 can be justified in response to [events] in 2001. Some states seem to want to invent new laws to justify new practices.”

The US argues that its drone strikes are highly effective at combating insurgency abroad and do not violate international law. However, Washington has come under fire recently for multiple drone incursions that killed dozens of civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Both China and Russia issued statements to the UN Human Rights Council this week condemning the US use of drone strikes.

Source

  1. fabulowes reblogged this from freace0
  2. freace0 reblogged this from anonymousmilitant
  3. jamespoynton reblogged this from anonymousmilitant
  4. bwansen reblogged this from elfboi
  5. malcontentment reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  6. fuckyeahbraziliandanny reblogged this from anonymousmilitant
  7. randomactsofchaos reblogged this from other-stuff
  8. jacobjangelo reblogged this from other-stuff
  9. other-stuff reblogged this from silas216
  10. well-it-is-whatever reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  11. student-for-an-anarchist-society reblogged this from 3rdobserver
  12. ohsanaam reblogged this from anonymousmilitant
  13. 3rdobserver reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  14. har-megiddo reblogged this from silas216
  15. sirsammichman reblogged this from man-of-clay
  16. silas216 reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  17. waiyanjpn reblogged this from dqwes
  18. joshuaduane reblogged this from scorchingwildfire
  19. thepeoplesrecord posted this