The People's Record

An ongoing chronicle of communities of resistance around the world: anti-racism, anti-zionism, anti-imperialism, the Arab Spring, anti-austerity protests in Greece and across Europe, student movements all around the world, the Occupy Movement, anti-capitalist movements, anarchist movements, socialist movements, leftist communities and other relevant international news.

photo

Walmart, the most powerful company in the world, admits that protests and strikes lead to wage increases
Workers threaten to walk out on Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year. Speedbump in Walmart’s race to the bottom?
October 19, 2012
For the first time ever, a strike is taking place in America aimed at the most powerful company in the economy: Walmart. Workers at Walmart stores across the country, as Josh Eidelson reports, are threatening to walk out on Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year. These labor actions are coming on top of earlier labor actions at Walmart’s warehouse contractors linked to “non-payment of overtime, non-payment for all hours worked, and even pay less than the minimum wage.”
The possible strike could be very significant, because the target of the strike is the most important driver of the race to the bottom economy. Walmart is massive – the company is the largest private employer in the US, with more than 2 million employees. The average American household spends $3500 at Walmart, and in 2006, the company alone represented 2.3% of the American GDP. The company is so powerful that when a Walmart Supercenter comes into your community, the entire community’s  obesity rate  increases. It is also, as  New America scholar Barry Lynn has argued in  End of the Line , a force that has reshaped the American corporate world.
Though known for suppressing wages, I found evidence that the company is willing to change working conditions with sufficient pressure. According to St. Louis Federal Reserve President William Poole, the last time there was significant labor unrest at Walmart, in 2006, the company raised wages at 700 stores. Poole, like many at the Fed, regularly spoke with Walmart executives, and they gave him unvarnished views about their business practices because they believed (as did Poole) that the information would be used solely for macro-economic forecasting.  On  March 27-28,  2006, Poole said that his Walmart contact told him the company would not raise wages, and was planning on moving their work force increasingly towards part-time employment. Poole was interested in this because of its bearing on inflation. “Wages,” he said, “and these are for hourly workers, are absolutely flat – no increases whatsoever in the last year and no increases planned going forward.” Poole continued, “About 20 percent of their associates are part time and that they are going to be increasing that share to 40 percent so they can staff at peak times and get more productivity out of their workforce.”
Just two months later, Poole offered some very different and shocking news , “My Wal-Mart contact also said that “Wal-Mart is in the process of raising starting wages in about 700 stores. This is the first time in eight years of talking with him that I’ve heard any comment like that. He said that some of the raises are part of the Wal-Mart, I’ll call it “Social/political” agenda because of all the controversy about Wal-Mart.” The FOMC transcripts are as close as we’re going to get to internal corporate dialogue without discovery or leaks. The reason I found this information is because Walmart has become a significant presence at the Fed; forecasters at the key Federal Open Market Committee meetings increasingly rely on what the retailer tells them about the economy. Now, FOMC transcripts aren’t released for at least five years, so we don’t know whether this strike is registering with those high level policymakers. But the last time there was a far less aggressive  union-backed attack on Walmart ‘s business practices, it did.
Source
The Walmart strike continues across 12 states, with Oklahoma employees joining the strike most recently. 

Walmart, the most powerful company in the world, admits that protests and strikes lead to wage increases

Workers threaten to walk out on Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year. Speedbump in Walmart’s race to the bottom?

October 19, 2012

For the first time ever, a strike is taking place in America aimed at the most powerful company in the economy: Walmart. Workers at Walmart stores across the country, as Josh Eidelson reports, are threatening to walk out on Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year. These labor actions are coming on top of earlier labor actions at Walmart’s warehouse contractors linked to “non-payment of overtime, non-payment for all hours worked, and even pay less than the minimum wage.”

The possible strike could be very significant, because the target of the strike is the most important driver of the race to the bottom economy. Walmart is massive – the company is the largest private employer in the US, with more than 2 million employees. The average American household spends $3500 at Walmart, and in 2006, the company alone represented 2.3% of the American GDP. The company is so powerful that when a Walmart Supercenter comes into your community, the entire community’s  obesity rate  increases. It is also, as  New America scholar Barry Lynn has argued in  End of the Line a force that has reshaped the American corporate world.

Though known for suppressing wages, I found evidence that the company is willing to change working conditions with sufficient pressure. According to St. Louis Federal Reserve President William Poole, the last time there was significant labor unrest at Walmart, in 2006, the company raised wages at 700 stores. Poole, like many at the Fed, regularly spoke with Walmart executives, and they gave him unvarnished views about their business practices because they believed (as did Poole) that the information would be used solely for macro-economic forecasting.  On  March 27-28,  2006, Poole said that his Walmart contact told him the company would not raise wages, and was planning on moving their work force increasingly towards part-time employment. Poole was interested in this because of its bearing on inflation. “Wages,” he said, “and these are for hourly workers, are absolutely flat – no increases whatsoever in the last year and no increases planned going forward.” Poole continued, “About 20 percent of their associates are part time and that they are going to be increasing that share to 40 percent so they can staff at peak times and get more productivity out of their workforce.”

Just two months later, Poole offered some very different and shocking news , “My Wal-Mart contact also said that “Wal-Mart is in the process of raising starting wages in about 700 stores. This is the first time in eight years of talking with him that I’ve heard any comment like that. He said that some of the raises are part of the Wal-Mart, I’ll call it “Social/political” agenda because of all the controversy about Wal-Mart.” The FOMC transcripts are as close as we’re going to get to internal corporate dialogue without discovery or leaks. The reason I found this information is because Walmart has become a significant presence at the Fed; forecasters at the key Federal Open Market Committee meetings increasingly rely on what the retailer tells them about the economy. Now, FOMC transcripts aren’t released for at least five years, so we don’t know whether this strike is registering with those high level policymakers. But the last time there was a far less aggressive  union-backed attack on Walmart ‘s business practices, it did.

Source

The Walmart strike continues across 12 states, with Oklahoma employees joining the strike most recently. 

  1. toastmasterlex reblogged this from i-am-a-child-of-time
  2. retasukate reblogged this from pissedoffliberalmomma
  3. pissedoffliberalmomma reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  4. i-am-a-child-of-time reblogged this from recall-all-republicans and added:
    GO Wal-Mart employees! Take the power back tbh
  5. thehershburglar reblogged this from descentintotyranny
  6. zhaoly reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  7. pinkbaron reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  8. becuzbacon reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  9. recall-all-republicans reblogged this from foulmouthedliberty
  10. littleblackkittycat reblogged this from foulmouthedliberty and added:
    I’d be thrilled if they did. You go, guys, gals, and whatever gender/intergender/nongender you identify as!
  11. descentintotyranny reblogged this from foulmouthedliberty
  12. foulmouthedliberty reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
    I don’t know if there could be any justice more poetic than Walmart employees refusing to work on Black Friday.
  13. cicerosaidwhatnow reblogged this from secular-paladin
  14. dermoosealini reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  15. secular-paladin reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
    Reminder to everyone: crossing a picket line means we’re not friends.
  16. romulus-jago reblogged this from inkdefense
  17. upst8ofmind reblogged this from keeping-sane
  18. narfinklewhosewhatsit reblogged this from dat-asterisk
  19. jolly-dolly reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  20. nathannazareth reblogged this from exploringsikorsky
  21. exploringsikorsky reblogged this from kirbywasthere
  22. kirbywasthere reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  23. hippiewithablog reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  24. dat-asterisk reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  25. lipstickndynamite reblogged this from cleoselene
  26. otakucouture reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  27. myronkeith reblogged this from orbitalizationalism
  28. isabowel reblogged this from real-news
  29. animalfreak11 reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord

Following