Drones, beware: UN investigates Obama’s targeted killingsJanuary 24, 2013
After years of warning that President Obama’s targeted killing program skirted with lawlessness, the United Nations has announced it’s investigating the centerpiece of the U.S.’ shadow wars worldwide.
The inquiry will be led by Ben Emmerson, the U.N.’s special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism. It’ll focus on most of the places that the U.S.’ armed drones and elite special-operations forces operate: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia; as well as in the Palestinian territories, indicating that Israel’s targeted attacks on Hamas will be a subject as well.
Emmerson’s focus will be on an “applicable legal framework” for targeted killing, with a special emphasis on drones — something that the lethal technology employed by the U.S. has outpaced, to the chagrin of many legal experts. Afghanistan is the only declared and internationally recognized conflict zone in which the United States operates, and while the U.S. maintains its strikes outside Afghanistan are legal, that legal premise rests on a 2001 act of Congress that many other nations don’t recognize. U.S. strikes have surged in Pakistan so far this year.
What’s more, the U.N. promises “a critical examination of the factual evidence concerning civilian casualties.” That holds out the chance of creating, for the first time, an internationally established standard for the number of noncombatants who have died in drone strikes and commando raids, the subject of fierce dispute and little official acknowledgement.

Emmerson told a press conference in London that he’s going to focus on 25 test cases, seemingly of drone strikes, primarily. (Drone strikes and targeted killings are distinct U.S. efforts — targeted killing often employs drones, but drone efforts go beyond the lethal strikes — that often get conflated.) TheGuardian previously reported that Emmerson has expressed concern about so-called “double-tap” strikes, in which U.S. drones attack the debris of earlier strikes when people, including rescue workers, gather to investigate.
Drone critics are cheering the inquiry, which follows years of international-law experts warning the U.S. was dancing on the precipice of lawlessness. “Virtually no other country agrees with the U.S.’s claimed authority to secretly declare people enemies of the state and kill them and civilian bystanders far from any recognized battlefield,” said Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union. “To date, there has been an abysmal lack of transparency and no accountability for the U.S. government’s ever-expanding targeted killing program.”
There is so far no indication of the level of cooperation Emmerson will seek from the United States, let alone how much the Obama administration will provide. Emmerson’s report is due in the fall.
Typically, inconvenient United Nations pronunciations are ignored inside the U.S. — when they’re not insulted outright by a U.N.-wary political class. Yet dozens of nations are experimenting with drone technology, including U.S. adversaries like Iran, prompting fears of an unmanned, robotic arms race. That’s probably not the biggest U.S. concern, given the overwhelming U.S. robotic advantage, especially in on-deck drone tech like the Navy’s forthcoming carrier-based armed drone. But even if the U.S. doesn’t like his work, Emmerson might represent the first wave of an international legal framework governing a technology that doesn’t right now clearly follow one — which might also give legitimacy to at least some robotic or targeted killing efforts.
Source

Drones, beware: UN investigates Obama’s targeted killings
January 24, 2013

After years of warning that President Obama’s targeted killing program skirted with lawlessness, the United Nations has announced it’s investigating the centerpiece of the U.S.’ shadow wars worldwide.

The inquiry will be led by Ben Emmerson, the U.N.’s special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism. It’ll focus on most of the places that the U.S.’ armed drones and elite special-operations forces operate: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia; as well as in the Palestinian territories, indicating that Israel’s targeted attacks on Hamas will be a subject as well.

Emmerson’s focus will be on an “applicable legal framework” for targeted killing, with a special emphasis on drones — something that the lethal technology employed by the U.S. has outpaced, to the chagrin of many legal experts. Afghanistan is the only declared and internationally recognized conflict zone in which the United States operates, and while the U.S. maintains its strikes outside Afghanistan are legal, that legal premise rests on a 2001 act of Congress that many other nations don’t recognize. U.S. strikes have surged in Pakistan so far this year.

What’s more, the U.N. promises “a critical examination of the factual evidence concerning civilian casualties.” That holds out the chance of creating, for the first time, an internationally established standard for the number of noncombatants who have died in drone strikes and commando raids, the subject of fierce dispute and little official acknowledgement.

Emmerson told a press conference in London that he’s going to focus on 25 test cases, seemingly of drone strikes, primarily. (Drone strikes and targeted killings are distinct U.S. efforts — targeted killing often employs drones, but drone efforts go beyond the lethal strikes — that often get conflated.) TheGuardian previously reported that Emmerson has expressed concern about so-called “double-tap” strikes, in which U.S. drones attack the debris of earlier strikes when people, including rescue workers, gather to investigate.

Drone critics are cheering the inquiry, which follows years of international-law experts warning the U.S. was dancing on the precipice of lawlessness. “Virtually no other country agrees with the U.S.’s claimed authority to secretly declare people enemies of the state and kill them and civilian bystanders far from any recognized battlefield,” said Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union. “To date, there has been an abysmal lack of transparency and no accountability for the U.S. government’s ever-expanding targeted killing program.”

There is so far no indication of the level of cooperation Emmerson will seek from the United States, let alone how much the Obama administration will provide. Emmerson’s report is due in the fall.

Typically, inconvenient United Nations pronunciations are ignored inside the U.S. — when they’re not insulted outright by a U.N.-wary political class. Yet dozens of nations are experimenting with drone technology, including U.S. adversaries like Iran, prompting fears of an unmanned, robotic arms race. That’s probably not the biggest U.S. concern, given the overwhelming U.S. robotic advantage, especially in on-deck drone tech like the Navy’s forthcoming carrier-based armed drone. But even if the U.S. doesn’t like his work, Emmerson might represent the first wave of an international legal framework governing a technology that doesn’t right now clearly follow one — which might also give legitimacy to at least some robotic or targeted killing efforts.

Source

  1. nojusticenopizza reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  2. aneekersneekers reblogged this from monolidmaneater
  3. monolidmaneater reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  4. iamarevolutionary2 reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  5. process-effect reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  6. bwansen reblogged this from guerrillatech
  7. silas216 reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  8. existentialistmumbojumbo reblogged this from prdjournal
  9. seymourbuhts reblogged this from prdjournal
  10. besturlonhere reblogged this from antoine-roquentin
  11. strawberrygrannyisms reblogged this from cultureofresistance
  12. antoine-roquentin reblogged this from communistmom and added:
    oh no not the UN which receives 22% of its funding from the US. at least it’ll probably provide another decent report...
  13. communistmom reblogged this from upst8ofmind
  14. undeadlennin reblogged this from upst8ofmind
  15. upst8ofmind reblogged this from guerrillatech
  16. leftistshuffle reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  17. prdjournal reblogged this from guerrillatech and added:
    Money will be paid and nothing will happen.
  18. guerrillatech reblogged this from hackr
  19. ttomsshanks reblogged this from veganantifa
  20. veganantifa reblogged this from theveganarchist
  21. theveganarchist reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  22. anarcho-ace reblogged this from outofstepwiththeuniverse
  23. castehindusstolemybhagwaans reblogged this from baatin
  24. occupyingyourpolitics reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  25. modestandroid reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord