So this lobbyist (representing weapons/drones companies) testifying to the House Public Safety Committee explains honestly why his group is putting money into making sure that drones are allowed:

My name is Paul Applewhite; I’m on the board of directors for the Pacific chapter of the Association of Unmanned Vehicles Systems International…in the Pacific Northwest we represent about 80 companies, 1,400 employees, about 120 million dollars in taxable revenue…the backlash against unmanned vehicles has just caused the city of Seattle to cancel their unmanned systems. Back in May of 2012, you had Ian Stawicki who ran around and killed 5 people. The longer this man was running around the city of Seattle, the more people he was killing…why are we denying ourselves this great technology that is now available?



But now every time you pull this out you have to DOCUMENT IT, which to me discourages the use of it. We give every one of our law enforcement officers lethal force on their hip. We’re saying, give them the judgment to be able to pull this thing out and use it, up to and including lethal force. Why is this technology so much different? 

So, it’s really come to this already. Lobbyists transparently, openly, unapologetically calling to use drone technology to kill Americans on U.S. soil - not that it is any worse or more significant than killing U.S. citizens who are out-of-the-country, like American citizen Anwar Awlaki and his 16-year-old Abdulrahman Awlaki (neither of whom had a history of violence, at all) both of whom were killed by the U.S. without being charged with any crime and without any form of due-process.

But still, that this sort of discourse is now the status-quo, and is now being aggressively pursued by billion-dollar special interests publicly is terrifyingly.

  1. djthisway reblogged this from norbeartoes
  2. socialreformatory reblogged this from sojourn76
  3. outlawpatriot reblogged this from sojourn76 and added:
    The reasons drones are bad are numerous. Right now, we have humans controlling them, killing people with no due process,...
  4. sojourn76 reblogged this from tr0tskitty
  5. tr0tskitty reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  6. hellolovelyscientist reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  7. tatrtotz reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  8. fattyfalldown reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  9. mochente reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  10. zanbandia reblogged this from wolfsheadwolfsheart
  11. wolfsheadwolfsheart reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
  12. arcadiasilver reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  13. theyoungwitch reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  14. celiawithkent reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  15. fuseralma reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  16. dizzydezzi reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  17. stormbornfeminism reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  18. bhmarion reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  19. quixylvre reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias and added:
    I’m against the use of armed drones against american citizens on american land, but I have to ask everyone here...
  20. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  21. soldierpixie reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  22. silas216 reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  23. auroramere reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  24. mightynewshoes reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
    Take note that he starts with with the only things legislature considers in decision-making anymore: the number of votes...
  25. therabbitdown reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  26. ithinkmaybeimdreaming reblogged this from dose-me