The People's Record

An ongoing chronicle of communities of resistance around the world: anti-racism, anti-zionism, anti-imperialism, the Arab Spring, anti-austerity protests in Greece and across Europe, student movements all around the world, the Occupy Movement, anti-capitalist movements, anarchist movements, socialist movements, leftist communities and other relevant international news.

photo

Swiss voters have overwhelmingly backed proposals to impose some of the world’s strictest controls on executive-payMarch 3, 2013 Nearly 68% of the voters supported plans to give shareholders a veto on compensation and ban big payouts for new and departing managers. Business groups argued the proposals would damage Swiss competitiveness. But analysts say ordinary Swiss are concerned about a growing economic divide in the country. The vote came just days after the EU approved measures to cap bankers bonuses. ‘Fat cat initiative’ The final results showed that all 26 Swiss cantons backed the proposals. In all, 1.6 million voters said “Yes” against 762,000, who rejected the idea. The BBC’s Imogen Foulkes, in Berne, says multibillion dollar losses by Swiss banking giant UBS, and thousands of redundancies at pharmaceutical company Novartis, have caused anger in Switzerland - because high salaries and bonuses for managers continued unchanged. The new measures will give Switzerland some of the world’s strictest rules on corporations. Shareholders will have a veto over salaries, golden handshakes will be forbidden, and managers of companies who flout the rules could face prison. The “fat cat initiative”, as it has been called, will be written into the Swiss constitution and apply to all Swiss companies listed on Switzerland’s stock exchange. Support for the plans - brain child of Swiss businessman turned politician Thomas Minder - has been fuelled by a series of perceived disasters for major Swiss companies, coupled with salaries and bonuses staying high. Our correspondent says the main example is banking giant UBS, which wrote off billions in the wake of the 2007 sub-prime mortgage crisis, and then had to be bailed out by the Swiss government. A further incident came in February when it was announced that the outgoing chairman Novartis’, Daniel Vasella, would be receiving a 72m Swiss francs (£51m; $78m) “non-compete” pay off over six years, designed to stop him working for other related industries. The payment was later scrapped, but it provoked anger and amazement in Switzerland, because his salary had been regarded as too high and the firm had been cutting jobs, our correspondent adds. One of the organisers of the referendum, Brigitte Moser Harder, told the BBC she thought the Swiss people agreed with the proposals because the gap between rich and poor had become wider. “From the beginning, 2006, we had the support of the people of Switzerland because you know not everybody in Switzerland is rich. “It’s also a social problem because the high wages got higher and the small ones sometimes just got lower. I think people have the support of the Swiss people because of that.” Meanwhile, under an EU deal agreed last week by the bloc’s 27 nations, bonuses will be capped at a year’s salary, but can rise to two year’s pay if there is explicit approval from shareholders. The UK argued the EU bonus rules would drive away talent and restrict growth in the financial sector. Source

Swiss voters have overwhelmingly backed proposals to impose some of the world’s strictest controls on executive-pay
March 3, 2013

Nearly 68% of the voters supported plans to give shareholders a veto on compensation and ban big payouts for new and departing managers.

Business groups argued the proposals would damage Swiss competitiveness.

But analysts say ordinary Swiss are concerned about a growing economic divide in the country.

The vote came just days after the EU approved measures to cap bankers bonuses.

‘Fat cat initiative’

The final results showed that all 26 Swiss cantons backed the proposals.

In all, 1.6 million voters said “Yes” against 762,000, who rejected the idea.

The BBC’s Imogen Foulkes, in Berne, says multibillion dollar losses by Swiss banking giant UBS, and thousands of redundancies at pharmaceutical company Novartis, have caused anger in Switzerland - because high salaries and bonuses for managers continued unchanged.

The new measures will give Switzerland some of the world’s strictest rules on corporations.

Shareholders will have a veto over salaries, golden handshakes will be forbidden, and managers of companies who flout the rules could face prison.

The “fat cat initiative”, as it has been called, will be written into the Swiss constitution and apply to all Swiss companies listed on Switzerland’s stock exchange.

Support for the plans - brain child of Swiss businessman turned politician Thomas Minder - has been fuelled by a series of perceived disasters for major Swiss companies, coupled with salaries and bonuses staying high.

Our correspondent says the main example is banking giant UBS, which wrote off billions in the wake of the 2007 sub-prime mortgage crisis, and then had to be bailed out by the Swiss government.

A further incident came in February when it was announced that the outgoing chairman Novartis’, Daniel Vasella, would be receiving a 72m Swiss francs (£51m; $78m) “non-compete” pay off over six years, designed to stop him working for other related industries.

The payment was later scrapped, but it provoked anger and amazement in Switzerland, because his salary had been regarded as too high and the firm had been cutting jobs, our correspondent adds.

One of the organisers of the referendum, Brigitte Moser Harder, told the BBC she thought the Swiss people agreed with the proposals because the gap between rich and poor had become wider.

“From the beginning, 2006, we had the support of the people of Switzerland because you know not everybody in Switzerland is rich.

“It’s also a social problem because the high wages got higher and the small ones sometimes just got lower. I think people have the support of the Swiss people because of that.”

Meanwhile, under an EU deal agreed last week by the bloc’s 27 nations, bonuses will be capped at a year’s salary, but can rise to two year’s pay if there is explicit approval from shareholders.

The UK argued the EU bonus rules would drive away talent and restrict growth in the financial sector.

Source

  1. fwestfal reblogged this from politically-controversial
  2. introvertedart reblogged this from silas216
  3. silas216 reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  4. timelessdrift reblogged this from kittentrippin
  5. nonfinity reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  6. 409-in-your-coffeemaker reblogged this from fucktheflagandfuckyou
  7. daringtodefy reblogged this from fucktheflagandfuckyou
  8. isthismyadventure reblogged this from kuvitelturuusu
  9. fucktheflagandfuckyou reblogged this from bootyregrit
  10. bootyregrit reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  11. mofo-ehmo reblogged this from inspirement
  12. kp777 reblogged this from mommapolitico
  13. djtoe reblogged this from cultureofresistance
  14. mommapolitico reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
  15. politically-controversial reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  16. irunthisgalaxy reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  17. quantum-perspective-leap reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  18. inertone reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  19. pharmuscidea reblogged this from randomactsofchaos

Following