Court blocks NYPD Stop & Frisk reforms, removes judge who found program unconstitutionalNovember 1, 2013
A sweeping set of changes to the New York City Police Department’s controversial “stop-and-frisk” program has been put on hold. In August, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin found the program unconstitutional, saying police had relied on a “policy of indirect racial profiling” that led officers to routinely stop “blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white.” 
While she did not halt the use of stop-and-frisk, Scheindlin appointed a federal court monitor to oversee a series of reforms. The city appealed Scheindlin’s ruling, saying it made officers “passive and scared” to frisk suspects. On Thursday, it got what it was hoping for, and much more. 
An appeals court stayed the changes, effectively postponing the operations of the monitor, while allowing police officers to continue using stop-and-frisk tactics. 
In a striking move, the court also took the unusual step of removing Scheindlin from the case, saying she “ran afoul” of the judiciary’s code of conduct and compromised the “appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation” by granting media interviews while the case was pending before her. 
All of this comes as stop-and-frisk has been a major issue in New York City’s mayoral election, which takes place this Tuesday. 
"The next mayor should consider withdrawing the appeal," says Sunita Patel, co-counsel on the stop-and-frisk federal class action lawsuit and a staff attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights. "Any fair-minded and neutral judge to look at the record … will come up with the same conclusion. There was a nine-week trial. There is 23,000 pages of evidence here, 8,000 pages of trial transcript. No one could come to a different conclusion than Judge Scheindlin."
Source

Court blocks NYPD Stop & Frisk reforms, removes judge who found program unconstitutional
November 1, 2013

A sweeping set of changes to the New York City Police Department’s controversial “stop-and-frisk” program has been put on hold. In August, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin found the program unconstitutional, saying police had relied on a “policy of indirect racial profiling” that led officers to routinely stop “blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white.”

While she did not halt the use of stop-and-frisk, Scheindlin appointed a federal court monitor to oversee a series of reforms. The city appealed Scheindlin’s ruling, saying it made officers “passive and scared” to frisk suspects. On Thursday, it got what it was hoping for, and much more.

An appeals court stayed the changes, effectively postponing the operations of the monitor, while allowing police officers to continue using stop-and-frisk tactics.

In a striking move, the court also took the unusual step of removing Scheindlin from the case, saying she “ran afoul” of the judiciary’s code of conduct and compromised the “appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation” by granting media interviews while the case was pending before her.

All of this comes as stop-and-frisk has been a major issue in New York City’s mayoral election, which takes place this Tuesday.

"The next mayor should consider withdrawing the appeal," says Sunita Patel, co-counsel on the stop-and-frisk federal class action lawsuit and a staff attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights. "Any fair-minded and neutral judge to look at the record … will come up with the same conclusion. There was a nine-week trial. There is 23,000 pages of evidence here, 8,000 pages of trial transcript. No one could come to a different conclusion than Judge Scheindlin."

Source

  1. fashxkhan reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  2. ofdreamsandsouls reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  3. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from kyssthis16
  4. dirtcrass reblogged this from disciplesofmalcolm
  5. brownroundboi reblogged this from navigatethestream
  6. sushibi reblogged this from bruschemi
  7. bruschemi reblogged this from stoicmeditations
  8. stoicmeditations reblogged this from ragemovement
  9. ragemovement reblogged this from theyoungradical
  10. prettyfemi reblogged this from liberationator
  11. seelinewoman reblogged this from theyoungradical
  12. liberationator reblogged this from theyoungradical
  13. theyoungradical reblogged this from morningpaz
  14. morningpaz reblogged this from unapologeticexistence
  15. unapologeticexistence reblogged this from afrofuturistaffair
  16. loonmaroon reblogged this from muzungus
  17. raceinreality reblogged this from wontbetelevised
  18. oneluv918 reblogged this from muzungus
  19. vmankss reblogged this from afroque
  20. raven-things reblogged this from wontbetelevised
  21. afroque reblogged this from black-is-my-life
  22. black-is-my-life reblogged this from muzungus
  23. muzungus reblogged this from wontbetelevised
  24. wontbetelevised reblogged this from ask4permission1st
  25. pyrimidines reblogged this from anotheriteration
  26. anotheriteration reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  27. thatawkwardchicana reblogged this from tierracita
  28. tierracita reblogged this from bigmacqueen and added:
    Fuck this bullshit
  29. natura-artis-magistra reblogged this from bigmacqueen
  30. no-fandom-url reblogged this from drmcawesome
  31. thehiphopinitiative reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  32. politicaljourney reblogged this from humanrightswatch
  33. evelark reblogged this from obscenepromqueen
  34. dreadedfork reblogged this from kiranirvanna